Summary of Major
Findings and Recommendations
I. FINANCING THE PRESENT PROGRAM
The Council has examined the financing of the present program apart
from any changes which it is recommending and has found as follows:
1. The Status of the Program and Allocation of Contribution
Income.-The social security program as a whole is soundly financed,
its funds are properly invested, and on the basis of actuarial estimates
that the Council has reviewed and found sound and appropriate, provision
has been made to meet all of the costs of the program both in the
short run and over the long-range future. The contribution income
should be reallocated between the two trust funds, however, so that
the disability insurance part of the program, like the old-age and
survivors insurance part of the program and the program as a whole,
will be in close actuarial balance.
2. Adjustment in the Contribution Rate Schedule in
the Short Range.-The contribution rates now scheduled in the
law should be adjusted to avoid the rapid increase in trust fund
assets that will otherwise begin with the rate increases scheduled
for 1966 and 1968.
3. The Contribution Rates in the Long Range.-There should
continue to be included in the law a schedule of contribution rates
which, according to the intermediate-cost estimates, will be sufficient
to support the program over the long-range future. However, decisions
about putting future rate increases into effect, once the rates
actually being charged are high enough to cover the long-range cost
of the program as shown by a reasonable minimum estimate, should
be guided largely by estimates of program costs over a 15- or 20-year
period.
4. The Contribution and Benefit Base.-The maximum
amount of annual earnings that is taxable and creditable toward
benefits needs to be substantially increased in order to maintain
the wage-related character of the benefits, to restore a broader
financial base for the program and to apportion the cost of the
system among low-paid and higher-paid workers in the most desirable
way.
5. The Contribution Rate for the Self-Employed.-Increases
in the social security contribution rate for the self-employed beyond
the present rate should be put into effect gradually, and only to
the extent that the ultimate rate will be no more than 1 percent
of earnings greater than the rate paid by employees.
6. Maintaining the Integrity of the Trust Funds.-To
maintain the integrity of the trust funds, the reimbursement of
the trust funds for the cost of paying social security benefits
based on military service for which no contributions were paid should
begin without further delay and the Board of Trustees should be
given specific responsibility for reviewing those administrative
charges against the trust funds which are based on estimates rather
than on actual costs.
II. HOSPITAL INSURANCE FOR OLDER PEOPLE AND THE DISABLED
The Council proposes hospital insurance protection for those 65
or over and for disabled social security beneficiaries as follows:
1. Inpatient Hospital Benefits.-The proposed hospital
insurance for people age 65 or over and the disabled should cover
a number of days sufficient to meet the cost of inpatient hospital
services for the full stay of almost all beneficiaries.
2. Outpatient Hospital Diagnostic Services. Payment under
the program should be made for the costs of outpatient hospital
diagnostic services furnished beneficiaries.
3. Deductibles.-Hospitalized beneficiaries should pay
a deductible equal to the cost of one-half day of care--$20 at the
program's beginning. In the case of beneficiaries who are provided
outpatient diagnostic services, this deductible amount should be
applied for each 30-day period during which diagnostic services
are provided.
4. Services in Extended-Care Facilities.-The
cost of post-hospitalization extended-care services in facilities
which provide high-quality rehabilitative and convalescent services
should be covered so as to pay for a minimum number of days after
hospitalization in all cases, with additional days of extended-care
services being paid for if the patient has not used all of his inpatient
hospital coverage.
5. Organized Home Nursing Services.-Insurance coverage should
be provided for organized home nursing services.
6. Payments on the Basis of Reasonable Cost.-The
extent of hospital insurance and related protection should be specified
in terms of the services covered rather than in terms of fixed dollars,
and covered services should be paid for on the basis of the full
reasonable cost of the services.
7. Hospital Staff Review of Utilization.-Hospitals
should be required, as a condition of participation, to establish
professional staff committees to review the services utilized.
8. Administration.-The proposed hospital insurance provisions
should be administered by the same Federal agencies which administer
the social security program but in carrying out this responsibility
the Federal Government should use private and State agencies to
the extent that these agencies can contribute to efficient and effective
operation.
9. The Basis of Eligibility for Benefits.-Hospital
insurance benefits should be provided for aged and disabled beneficiaries
of the social security program, and special provision should be
made for the next few years for those who have not met the requirements
of eligibility under the program.
10. Financing.-The proposed hospital insurance program should
be financed by a special earmarked contribution of 0.4 percent of
covered earnings from employees and from employers, and 0.5 percent
from the self-employed, with an 0.15 percent contribution from Federal
general revenues to cover the cost of benefits for those already
retired or disabled.
III. IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CASH-BENEFIT PROVISIONS
The Council has examined all aspects of the present program of
cash benefits and is recommending changes as follows:
Social Security Benefit Amounts
1. The Period for Computing Benefits for Men.-The
period for computing benefits (and insured status) for men should
be based, as is now the case for women, on the period up to the
year of attainment of age 62, instead of age 65 as under present
law, with the result that 3 additional years of low earnings would
be dropped from the computation of retirement benefits for men.
2. A General Increase in Benefits.-A general increase
in benefit amounts, accomplished by a change in the way the benefit
formula is constructed, should be provided to take into account
increases in wages and prices since the last general benefit increase
in 1958, and the maximum on monthly family benefits should be related
to earnings throughout the benefit range.
3. The Maximum Lump-Sum Death Payment.-The maximum lump-sum
death payment should not be set in terms of an absolute dollar limit
but rather should be the same as the highest family maximum monthly
benefit.
Dependents' and Survivors' Benefits
4. Children Over Age 18 Attending School.-Benefits should
be payable to a child until he reaches age 22, provided the child
is attending school between ages 18 and 22.
5. Disabled Widows.-The disabled widow of an insured
worker, if she became disabled before her husband's death or before
her youngest child became 18, or within a limited period after either
of these events, should be entitled to widow's benefits regardless
of her age.
6. Definition of Child.-A child should be paid benefits
based on his father's earnings without regard to whether he has
the status of a child under State inheritance laws if the father
was supporting the child or had a legal obligation to do so.
Disability Benefits
7. Young Disabled Workers.-Young workers who become disabled
should have their eligibility for benefits determined on the basis
of a test of substantial and recent employment that is appropriate
for such workers.
8. Rehabilitation of Disability Beneficiaries.-The
social security program should pay the costs of rehabilitation for
disability beneficiaries likely to be returned to gainful work through
such help, with the rehabilitation services being provided through
State vocational rehabilitation agencies.
Eligibility for Benefits
9. Insured Status.-The Council recommends retention
of a requirement of covered work as a test of eligibility for benefits,
and has no major changes to recommend in the present provisions.
10. Retirement Test.-The provision in the law that
prevents the payment of benefits to a person with substantial earnings
from current work--the retirement test--is essential in a program
designed to replace lost work income and should be retained.
Extending the Coverage of the Program
11. Doctors of Medicine.-Self-employed doctors of medicine
should be covered on the same basis as other self-employed people
now covered, and interns should be covered on the same basis as
other employees working for the same employer.
12. Tips.-Social security contributions should be paid on
tips an employee receives from a customer of his employer, and tips
should be counted toward benefits.
13. Federal Employees.-Social security credit should be
provided for the Federal employment of workers whose Federal service
was covered under the civil service retirement system but who are
not protected under that system at the time they retire, become
disabled, or die.
14. State and Local Government Employees.-The
coverage of additional State and local government employees should
be facilitated by making available to all States the option of covering
only those present members of State and local government retirement
system groups who wish to be covered, with coverage of all new members
of the group being compulsory. Also, policemen and firemen in all
States should be provided the same opportunity for coverage as other
State and local government employees.
The tax rates needed to finance the changes recommended
by the Council
(The contribution rates under present law are applicable to annual
earnings up to $4,800; the proposed contribution rates would apply
to annual earnings of $4,800 in 1965, $6,000 in 1966 and 1967 and
$7,200 in 1968 and thereafter.)
|
Employee
and Employer, Each |
Self-Employed
|
|
OASDI
|
Hospital
Insurance |
OASDI
|
Hospital
Insurance |
Period
|
Pres.
Law |
Proposed
|
Pres.
Law |
Proposed
|
1965 |
3.625 |
3.625 |
-- |
5.4 |
5.4 |
-- |
1966-67 |
4.125 |
4.3 |
0.4 |
6.2 |
5.8 |
0.5 |
1968-70 |
4.625 |
4.3 |
0.4 |
6.9 |
5.8 |
0.5 |
1971-75 |
4.625 |
4.7 |
0.4 |
6.9 |
6.0 |
0.5 |
1976 and
after |
4.625 |
5.3 |
0.4 |
6.9 |
6.3 |
0.5 |
{1} The financing of the proposed hospital insurance
program would also include a level contribution of 0.15 percent
of covered payroll from Federal general revenues for the next
50 years (not shown in the table). |
|