Hearing Office Average Processing Time Ranking Report
FY 2011 (For Reporting Purposes: 9/25/2010 Through 09/23/2011)

A ranking of the 157 ODAR hearing offices (including 3 satellite offices) by the average number of days until final disposition of the hearing request. The average shown will be a combined average for all cases completed in that hearing office. Users will be able determine where a particular hearing office stands among the total with respect to this workload category.

National Ranking Report
By Average Processing Time
Fiscal YTD Ending: 09/23/2011
Workdays: 249

Rank Hearing Office Region Processing Time
1
PONCE
02
188
2
MAYAGUEZ
02
208
2
SHREVEPORT
06
208
4
RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX *
06
226
5
HOUSTON DOWNTOWN
06
234
6
KINGSPORT
04
248
7
PADUCAH
04
261
8
MIDDLESBORO
04
272
8
FORT SMITH
06
272
10
CHARLOTTESVILLE
03
274
11
CHATTANOOGA
04
276
12
NEW ORLEANS
06
277
13
MCALESTER
06
279
14
HOUSTON-BISSONNET
06
280
15
ALEXANDRIA
06
281
16
COVINGTON GA
04
283
17
FORT WORTH
06
285
18
SAN ANTONIO
06
288
19
ELKINS PARK
03
292
20
BROOKLYN
02
294
21
VALPARAISO IN
05
295
22
NORFOLK
03
296
23
LEXINGTON
04
297
23
LIVONIA MI
05
297
23
DALLAS NORTH
06
297
26
KNOXVILLE
04
298
26
GREENVILLE
04
298
28
ATLANTA NORTH
04
300
28
METAIRIE
06
300
28
LONG BEACH
09
300
31
HUNTINGTON
03
301
32
CHARLOTTE
04
303
32
MADISON
05
303
34
DALLAS DOWNTOWN
06
304
35
HONOLULU
09
306
36
DOVER
03
313
37
CHARLESTON SC
04
314
37
TOPEKA KS
07
314
39
LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN
09
316
40
STOCKTON
09
317
40
EVANSVILLE
05
317
42
ATLANTA DOWNTOWN
04
318
43
CREVE COEUR
07
319
44
RICHMOND
03
320
45
HATTIESBURG
04
321
46
HARRISBURG
03
322
47
SPOKANE
10
323
48
TUCSON
09
325
49
JACKSON
04
326
50
FAYETTEVILLE NC
04
329
50
EVANSTON
05
329
52
RALEIGH
04
330
52
SAVANNAH
04
330
54
SAN JUAN
02
331
54
OAK PARK
05
331
56
BOSTON
01
332
57
JERICHO
02
335
58
LOS ANGELES WEST
09
336
59
ALBUQUERQUE
06
338
60
QUEENS
02
339
61
ALBANY
02
340
62
SYRACUSE
02
341
63
CHARLESTON WV
03
342
63
LITTLE ROCK
06
342
63
ORANGE
09
342
66
WEST DES MOINES
07
346
67
TULSA
06
347
67
ORLAND PARK
05
347
67
SOUTH JERSEY
02
347
70
JACKSONVILLE
04
348
71
DETROIT
05
349
71
SAN BERNARDINO
09
349
73
MILWAUKEE
05
350
73
PHILADELPHIA EAST
03
350
75
AKRON OH
05
351
76
SAN RAFAEL
09
352
77
WICHITA
07
353
78
MANCHESTER
01
354
79
COLUMBIA SC
04
355
79
MT PLEASANT MI
05
355
81
SACRAMENTO
09
356
82
TAMPA
04
357
82
ORLANDO
04
357
82
WILKES BARRE
03
357
85
DOWNEY
09
361
85
PEORIA
05
361
87
OKLAHOMA CITY
06
362
88
PHOENIX NORTH
09
366
88
PHILADELPHIA
03
366
88
MACON
04
366
91
SEVEN FIELDS
03
367
92
FT LAUDERDALE
04
368
93
BALTIMORE
03
369
94
PORTLAND ME
01
372
95
SPRINGFIELD MA
01
373
95
ANCHORAGE AK
10
373
95
FORT WAYNE
05
373
98
PORTLAND OR
10
375
99
FLINT
05
377
100
PASADENA
09
378
100
JOHNSTOWN
03
378
100
LAS VEGAS
09
378
103
HARTFORD
01
379
104
DENVER
08
383
105
SALT LAKE CITY
08
384
106
WHITE PLAINS
02
385
107
SANTA BARBARA
09
386
108
NEW YORK
02
389
108
MORGANTOWN
03
389
110
TALLAHASSEE FL
04
390
111
ROCHESTER *
02
391
111
SEATTLE
10
391
113
MEMPHIS
04
393
113
LOUISVILLE
04
393
115
FARGO
08
394
116
FORT MYERS FL *
04
395
117
SAN DIEGO
09
396
118
SAN FRANCISCO
09
397
119
CHICAGO
05
398
120
PROVIDENCE
01
399
121
ST PETERSBURG FL
04
400
122
BILLINGS
08
406
123
NASHVILLE
04
407
124
MINNEAPOLIS
05
408
125
MOBILE
04
410
126
CINCINNATI
05
411
127
SAN JOSE
09
415
127
WASHINGTON
03
415
129
MONTGOMERY
04
416
130
MIAMI
04
417
131
NEWARK
02
419
132
NEW HAVEN
01
421
132
FRESNO
09
421
134
TUPELO
04
422
135
COLORADO SPRINGS
08
423
136
KANSAS CITY
07
427
136
BRONX
02
427
138
LANSING
05
430
139
FLORENCE
04
431
140
PHOENIX
09
433
141
ROANOKE
03
434
142
OMAHA
07
436
142
OAKLAND
09
436
144
ST LOUIS
07
437
145
OAK BROOK
05
438
146
BIRMINGHAM
04
439
147
GREENSBORO
04
442
148
PITTSBURGH
03
449
148
EUGENE
10
449
150
TOLEDO OH
05
463
151
INDIANAPOLIS
05
473
152
CLEVELAND
05
479
153
COLUMBUS
05
481
154
GRAND RAPIDS
05
484
154
SPRINGFIELD MO
07
484
156
DAYTON
05
491
157
BUFFALO
02
494

* Satellite Offices reported separately from their parent office.

 

Disclaimer

These data are being made publicly available for research purposes. Any findings and conclusions derived from analyses of these data are attributable to the researcher(s) and do not reflect those of the Social Security Administration.