Rescinded
Rescinded May 10, 2018
Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 91, page 21811
SSR 68-36: SECTION 228(c) AND 228(h)(2). -- SPECIAL AGE 72 PAYMENT -- REDUCTION BECAUSE OF ELIGIBILITY FOR VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION PENSION
20 CFR 404.337(a) and (i)
SSR 68-36
- Where the amount of a veteran's special age 72 payment was reduced under section 228(C) of the Act because of his eligibility for a non-service-connected disability pension payable by the Veterans' Administration, but the veteran exercised his option to elect (in lieu of the pension) service-connected disability compensation, also payable by the Veterans' Administration, eligibility for which does not cause reduction in the amount of special age 72 payments held, election of such compensation precludes eligibility for the pension beginning with the month the election is effective, and, accordingly, beginning with such month the veteran's special age 72 payment is not subject to reduction under section 228(c) of the Act.
Effective October 1966, section 228 of the Social Security Act provides monthly payments to certain persons who are not insured under the regular or transitional insured status provisions of the Act, and who reach age 72 before 1968, or who have at least 3 quarters of coverage, earned at any time, for each calendar year after 1966 and before the year in which age 72 is attained.
R, who was receiving a non-service-connected disability pension of $78.75 a month from the Veterans' Administration, payable under section 521 of title 38, United States Code, and hereinafter referred to as a "pension," filed an application and became entitled to special age 72 payments of $35 a month under section 228 of the Social Security Act beginning with October 1966.[1]
Section 228(c)(1) of the Act provides that:
- The benefit amount of any individual under this section for any month shall be reduced (but not below zero) by the amount of any periodic benefit under a governmental pension system for which he is eligible for such month.
Section 228(h)(2) of the Act in pertinent part defines the term "governmental pension system" as:
- (2) * * * the insurance system established by this title or any other system or fund established by the United States * * * which provides for payment of (A) pensions, (B) retirement or retired pay, or (C) annuities or similar amounts payable on account of personal services performed by an individual (not including * * * any payment by the Veterans' Administration as compensation for service-connected disability or death.) (Emphasis supplied.)
In accordance with section 228(c)(1), therefore, R's special age 72 payment of $35 was reduced to zero because of his receipt of the VA pension of $78.75 a month.
In December 1966 under the pertinent regulation of the Veterans' Administration (38 Code of Federal Regulations 3.701(a)), R elected to receive service-connected disability compensation of $82 a month from the Veterans' Administration payable under section 310 of title 38, United States Code, and hereinafter referred to as "compensation." This conversion to disabilty compensation was effective retroactively to December 1965.[2]
Thus, beginning with December 1965, R was entitled to VA compensation, which under section 228(h)(2) of the Act (supra) is specifically excluded from the definition of "governmental pension system."
However, section 228(c)(1) calls for a reduction in the amount of the special age 72 benefit by the amount of any periodic benefit for which the beneficiary is eligible. Section 228(c)(4) of the Act in pertinent part provides that "* * * in determining whether an individual is eligible for periodic benefits under a governmental pension system -- (A) such individual shall be deemed to have filed application for such benefits * * *."
The question presented in this case is whether R continued to be eligible for the VA pension after he elected and became entitled to VA compensation in lieu of the pension. Should this eligibility continue, then his special age 72 payment would continue to be subject to the reduction called for by section 228(c)(1) of the Act, since such reduction is based upon eligibility for, rather than actual payment of, a periodic benefit.
Under the pertinent provisions of section 3104 of title 38, United States Code, pension and compensation cannot be concurrently paid. Accordingly, because of R's election and award of compensation effective December 1965, he cannot be considered as "eligible" for a pension for that and subsequent months for the purposes of section 228(c)(1) of the Act, at least as long as such election remains in effect. Rather, for such purposes, in the light of his subsequent election of compensation for those months he may now be considered as only eligible for compensation for those months. It is immaterial under the particular facts of this case that R had been drawing a pension for those months, or that his later election of compensation was optional.
Accordingly, it is held that R was not eligible for a periodic benefit under a governmental pension system for October 1966 or any later month, and therefore his special age 72 payment is not subject to reduction under section 228(c)(1) of the Act beginning with that month.
[1] Section 228(b) of the Act was amended by the Social Security Amendments of 1967 (P.L. 90-248) to increase the amount of this special payment from $35 to $40 a month, effective for payments for and after February 1968.
[2] R was unaware that he was potentially entitled to compensation in an amount higher than the amount of his pension, but in December 1966 when he elected to take the compensation in lieu of the pension, the Veterans' Administration awarded compensation retroactively to December 1965.